Task Force on Population Movement Yemen Report (May 2017)

[International Organization for Migration. Image from https://www.iom.int/.] [International Organization for Migration. Image from https://www.iom.int/.]

Task Force on Population Movement Yemen Report (May 2017)

By : Jadaliyya Reports

[The following report summary was published by the International Organization for Migration on 14 May 2017. For the full report, click here.]

The Task Force for Population Movement (TFPM), co-led by IOM and UNHCR is a Technical Working Group of the Yemen Protection Cluster. The TFPM implements an information management tool that gathers data on the status and location of displaced persons across Yemen.

As of 01 April 2017, the TFPM has identified, 1,988,946 internally displaced persons (IDPs) (331,491 house- holds) who have been displaced due to conflict since March 2015, dispersed across 21 governorates. For the same period, the TFPM has identified 900,258 returnees (150,043 households), across 19 governorates.

As a result, 10.4% of the total population of Yemen has experienced the shock of displacement due to conflict in the last 24 months.

Key Findings

  • Through March 2017 the TFPM has observed a minor overall decrease in the conflict-related displacement of 2,394 individuals (-0.12%). At the governorate level the most significant decreases have been observed in Hajjah, Dhamar and Sana’a (-22,560, -20,172 and -14,952 individuals, respectively).
  • On the other hand, there has been an overall decrease in the conflict-affected return population by 148,638 individuals (-14%). The top three governorates with the largest decrease in the identified conflict returnees are 1. Aden (-64,944 individuals, 2. Amanat Al Asimah (- 47,502) and 3. Al Hudaydah (-17,346).
  • Aden hosts the highest number of returnees in Yemen, most of whom reside in the same locations as vulnerable IDPs and host communities. Vulnerable IDPs and host community members were being counted among the returnee figures by key informants. This prompted TFPM to validate the figures from the 13th report through data collection from a wider network of key informants, resulting in more accurate returnee data in the 14th report.
  • In Amanat Al Asimah the drop in returnee figures was due to key informant frustration about the lack of an adequate and timely response. As a result, several key informants refused to cooperate, and had to be replaced with other key informants who do not possess the historical memory of returnee figures from 2015. Key informants also reported that due to the comparatively higher cost of living in Amanat al- Asimah, many returnees have opted to return to their ancestral villages.
  • The drop in returnee figures in Hudaydah & Taizz is largely due to returnees being redisplaced because of conflict escalation along the Western coast.
  • It remains that 87% of the population who have returned from their displacement in the last 23 months have returned to 33 districts. Geographically this represents just 10% of the 333 districts in Yemen, and therefore suggests that clear pockets of return, in areas of relative stability, may be materializing.
  • Of the total returnee population, an estimated 85% (or 766,542 individuals) have returned from displacement areas situated within their governorate of origin.
  • Indicative data collected by the TFPM at the community level through key informants show that the number one priority need among IDPs are: food (76%), access to income (8%), shelter/housing (4%) and cooking/washing water (4%).

 

  • ALSO BY THIS AUTHOR

    • Harvard AAUP on Termination of CMES Leadership

      Harvard AAUP on Termination of CMES Leadership

      The Executive Committee of AAUP-Harvard Faculty Chapter condemns the abrupt termination of the leadership of Harvard’s Center for Middle Eastern Studies (CMES): Professor Cemal Kafadar as Director and Associate Professor Rosie Bsheer as Associate Director. Though both Kafadar and Bsheer will retain their regular faculty positions, this summary dismissal of two leading Middle East scholars from their administrative positions is a political infringement on academic freedom and the autonomy of professors to shape intellectual agendas in their areas of research, teaching, and programming expertise.

    • Long Form Podcast Episode 4: Why the U.S. Media & Democrats Won’t Save Anyone (3 April)

      Long Form Podcast Episode 4: Why the U.S. Media & Democrats Won’t Save Anyone (3 April)

      In this episode of Long Form Podcast, Laila Al-Arian, Assal Rad, and Sana Saeed address the role of corporate media and the Democratic party in enabling Israel’s Genocide and paving the way for many of Trump’s policies. Speakers also address the Democrats’ double standard on ethnic cleansing in Palestine.

    • Teaching Palestine Today: Liberal Arts Context

      Teaching Palestine Today: Liberal Arts Context

      Join our first session of “Teaching Palestine Today” series. This session addresses the “Liberal Arts Context,” with Lara Deeb, Heather Ferguson, Amanda Lagji, and Leila Mansouri, moderated by Bassam Haddad. Four faculty members at the Claremont Colleges, a liberal arts consortium, discuss their approaches to including material on Palestine and Palestinian perspectives into classes in anthropology, history, postcolonial and decolonial literature, and creative writing. Topics addressed include classroom approaches, syllabi scaffolding, and strategies for building support beyond the classroom.

Study-Trip Report: Building Visions with Glass and Steel

The students of the Master Program "Governing the Large Metropolis" at the University of SciencesPo Paris have released Building Visions with Glass and Steelan “instant-book” based on their notes and photographs after their fieldtrip to Dubai and Dhabi, last January 2016. This document appears in two versions: a printed book and a web site--both of them richly adorned with their photographs.

It is now an integral part of Dubai’s mythology to be presented as a city which has “emerged” from the desert practically overnight, flouting any clear sense of agency in its construction process. But, pragmatically, how does one plan and oversee the construction of such a large-scale project? What could have possibly guided Dubai’s builders other than that elusive sense of “vision,” which has now become an integral part of the city’s discourse on its own development? It is no coincidence that Sheikh Mohammed ben Rashid Al Maktoum’s 2012 memoir was titled My Vision: Challenges in the Race for Excellence. […] Consisting in a collection of articles, essays, and think-pieces, [this] report is the product of a week-long study trip in the cities of Dubai and Abu Dhabi, undertaken in January 2016 by the first year students of Sciences Po Urban School’s master’s program “Governing the Large Metropolis.” As students in comparative urban governance and sociology, the aim of [this] trip was to understand the inner workings of both Emirati cities through their governance model and strategies for further development.

Focusing specifically on Dubai, this collection of articles attempts to outline the city’s continued strategy to distinguish itself in a world of competing cities. If Dubai’s development model today is more closely associated with the spectacular architectural frenzies of the Burj al-Arab and Burj Khalifa, adopting a historical perspective is crucial to appreciate the city’s long-term strategic vision for development. Harnessing this strategy requires sustained attention to infrastructural development, migration patterns and the political system. We have throughout this report strived to illuminate the “Dubai phenomenon” through a plurality of angles, which is also reflected in the different styles and formats of the following articles. The plurality of voices and impressions expressed throughout this report seeks to translate the multifaceted nature of a city which concentrates radical extremes.

The “instant-book” includes six sections, organizing the report’s twenty-one articles thematically. A first section examines questions of identity, culture and historical legacy in Dubai today, assessing how the city negotiates its entrance onto the world stage, balancing traditional tribal society with accelerated capitalist development. In a second section, the report focuses on the city’s strategy for image-driven development, and more specifically, how the economy of attractivity requires the city to ceaselessly project a particular urban vision to the rest of the world. A third section, called “Powering Dubai,” then focuses on the driving forces behind Dubai’s growth model. The need for foreign investments, as well as heavy reliance on immigrant labor, has characterized the Emirate’s often-relentless economic expansion. This section also evaluates the geopolitical stakes at play when it comes to Dubai’s extraordinary energy needs, as well as the liberal approach to investments and regulation that defines its business strategy. The fourth section is devoted specifically to the growing importance of environmental sustainability as an economic sector, both in Dubai and Abu Dhabi. Sustainability also possesses a political dimension in the UAE, as an alternative strategy to distance the Emirates from dependency on external resources, and diversify the economy. However, reconciling the attitudes of a growth-based society with objectives of conservation and protection has proved to be a difficult terrain of implementation. The fifth section focuses specifically on the governance model of Dubai: as a city-state composed of economic free zones within a kingdom, these overlapping layers of governance are reflected in the inner workings of a socially stratified society, and overlapping types of competing regulations. In a final section entitled “Dubai and the World,” the report reflects on the city’s place in the flux of international relations, with the agenda to simultaneously become a hub for global travel, a safe haven in a turbulent region, and an Islamic model counter-model to Western global cities.

The book`s editorial team include: Alice Dang, Raphael Gernath, Filipe Mello Rose, and Béatrice Mercier.